Mert Naci Turker vs Carlos Lopez Montagud Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Mar at 09:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Naci Turker vs C. Lopez Montagud

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Turker 1 - 0 Montagud
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mert Naci Turker winning 2 and Carlos Lopez Montagud winning 0. The last match between Mert Naci Turker and Carlos Lopez Montagud was at the M15 Antalya, 07-03-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Mert Naci Turker getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Turker | 1 |
| Montagud | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Antalya(03-07-25)
M. N. Turker vs C. L. Montagud H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,750 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.40% (182-194) | Career Total W/L | 58.77% (248-174) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. N. Turker vs C. L. Montagud Match Preview:
What can the second serve reveal about a player's match potential? In the last six months, Montagud has edged out slightly in this area, securing 45.36% of points on their second serve compared to Turker’s 44.43%. This small margin could indeed sway predictions significantly, especially if both players engage in a battle reliant on second serve performance.
How do players compare in returning serve, a crucial aspect of crafting match winners? Reflecting on their recent form, Montagud has claimed 47.77% of points on the opponent's second serve. Turker, however, marginally surpasses with 47.84%. When first serve returns enter the equation, Montagud’s 30.33% significantly overshadows Turker’s 25.35%, suggesting Montagud might hold the upper hand in breaking serve frequency.
Could the ability to save breakpoints decide the victor here? Montagud has thwarted 50.75% of breakpoints, whereas Turker’s rate stands at 54.55%. While Turker shows resilience, a significant breakpoint save rate like Montagud’s signals potential for strategic in-game maneuvers.
Analyzing their performance tapestry from the past year, Montagud closed with a victory in 55.38% of matches played (36 wins, 29 losses), yet Turker boasts a superior record with 64.29% (36 wins, 20 losses). Such differences in win percentages often paint a clear picture of overall competitiveness.
Does surface play impact predictability? Montagud shines on clay, triumphing in 60% of matches, whereas hard courts puzzle them, with a mere 44% win rate. Differently, Turker showcases their prowess on indoor hard courts with a 50% success rate, but trails on conventional hard courts with 42%. Thus, the court’s surface may carve out its narrative as this match unfolds.
In terms of competition levels, over the last year, Montagud carved victories in 60.47% of matches primarily within Futures/Satellites/ITF at $10K events. Turker navigated the same arenas with a slightly better 63.64% success rate. The level of competition faced often tweaks predictive judgments.
The caliber of opponents can't be ignored; Montagud’s average foe ranked 432.57, contrasting with Turker’s tougher adversary average of 378.09. Will superior experience against higher-ranked opponents forge an advantage for Turker?
Considering the deciding set records, Montagud flourished, winning 72% of such tense finales in the past year. Contrastingly, Turker’s 38% win rate indicates a vulnerability during high-stake deciders.
An intriguing aspect is break point conversion, telling of match flow. Montagud has capitalized on 32.84% of opportunities, whereas Turker lags slightly behind at 31.54%. Such statistics might tip the scales when competitors face break point pressure.
Ultimately, who will emerge victorious? Considering these intricate statistics and indicators, Montagud appears more likely to seize the win, leveraging consistent returns, decisive set resilience, and tactical break point conversion against Turker’s slightly tough competition background.
Mert Naci Turker vs Carlos Lopez Montagud Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. N. Turker vs C. L. Montagud H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:16:26 | Average Match Time | 1:16:26 |
| 72% (36/50) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29/49) |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (26/49) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. N. Turker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 1-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
C. L. Montagud Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(1) 7-6(1) | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||

M. N. Turker vs C. L. Montagud Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.40% (182/194) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.77% (248/174) |
| 49.15% (405/419) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.09% (548/429) |
| 50.99% (3824/3676) | Games Win/Loss | 52.95% (4832/4294) |
| 43.69% (45/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 50.18% (136/135) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.36% (241/165) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 522 | Aces Total | 611 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 693 | Total Double Faults | 683 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:38:1 |
| 335.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.75 |
| 60% (7996/13410) | 1st Serve % | 66% (16684/25342) |
| 66% (5268/7996) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (10801/16684) |
| 47% (2556/5414) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4371/8658) |
| 45% (605/1340) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1302/2941) |
| 41% (5436/13271) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11096/25991) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Challenger W/L | 52.17% (36/33) |
| 48.77% (178/187) | Futures W/L | 60.06% (212/141) |
| 48% (179/372) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (243/414) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 34% (21/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (51/103) |
| 42% (32/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (79/131) |
| 88% (186/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (235/205) |
| 12% (186/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (235/30) |
| 9% (190/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (187/42) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Landaluce H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Kjaer Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Prizmic Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Learner Tien vs Rafael Jodar Prediction – ATP Next Gen ATP Finals – 17th December 2025 Best Bets
